Financial Policy in the news
Government policy that will impact our bottom line
1. Senate replaces Obama tax increases with millionaires’ tax
When President Barack Obama announced his jobs package in early September, he proposed paying for the measure with a series of tax increases on individuals making more than $200,000 and families making more than $250,000. Among them was a 28% cap on the tax exemption for municipal bond purchases and a hike in the tax on “carried interest” for private fund managers from the capital gains rate to the individual rate. In their version of the jobs plan, Senate Democrats replaced the Obama tax increases with a 5.6% surcharge on millionaires. The tax would apply to adjusted gross income less investment interest deduction above $1 million. Senate Democrats believe that the $1 million threshold more clearly delineates the difference between the middle class and the wealthy.
2. Obama’s jobs plan sliced, diced, stalled in Congress
In rallies around the country earlier this fall, Mr. Obama touted his jobs package and urged Congress to “pass this bill now.” By October, he was hoping that Congress would approve at least parts of it. It’s been slow going. The Senate blocked the entire $447 billion measure from getting to the floor. It was then diced up into smaller parts, and some blocked later on. The first portion of the package to get any traction was a provision to repeal a tax on government contractors that is set to go into effect in 2013. The bill’s prospects in the Senate are unclear.
3. Bills to promote crowd funding, raise SEC registration thresholds pass House Financial Services Committee
A bill that is similar to another piece of Mr. Obama’s jobs package was approved by the House Financial Services Committee on Oct. 26, would allow so-called crowd funding to finance startup companies by allowing the firms to pool small investments up to $5 million without having to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission. State regulators object, arguing that the bill would foster fraud.
4. What is the Buffett Rule? Capitol Hill steps into the definition vacuum
As he ramped up his re-election effort this fall, Mr. Obama proposed a so-called Buffett Rule. Named after Warren Buffett, the idea is that middle-class taxpayers should never fork over a higher percentage of their earnings to the federal government than the wealthy. The notion is based on Mr. Buffett’s suggestion that it is wrong for him to pay taxes at a lower rate than his secretary. A new bill, imposes an additional 5% tax on income from $350,000 to $500,000, 10% on $500,000 to $1 million, 15% from $1 million to $10 million and 20% on income exceeding $10 million. Another group has put forth a far different concept – taxpayers would be allowed to donate money to the Treasury Department to help pay down the national debt. This last ‘concept’ has always been available BUT has yet to generate any income.
5. Republicans try to set rates on capital gains and dividends at 15% permanently and remove health care tax
House and Senate Republicans are attempting to bring some certainty to tax policy through a measure that would set capital gains and dividends rate permanently at 15%. If Congress does not extend the Bush tax cuts, the capital gains rate will rise to 20% and dividends will be taxed at individual rates beginning in 2013. In addition, the GOP is trying to get rid of a 3.8% Medicare tax that will be assessed on investment income starting in 2013 to help pay for the health care reform law. Not sure how they plan to pay for it in a balanced budget BUT it may be a way to stop Obamacare by stopping its funding.
6. Legislation could allow retirement account borrowing to pay mortgages
Retirement savings advocates are wary of a bill that would allow penalty-free withdrawals from tax-exempt pension and retirement plans in order to pay mortgages. It already allows it in 401K plans. I would prefer that they borrow than withdraw BUT not for mortgage payments without a financial plan that helps them get ‘real’ to their current financial situation.
7. DOL on fiduciary-duty rule
The Labor Department is making clear to the financial industry that it is not abandoning a regulation that would significantly expand the definition of “fiduciary” for investment advisers to retirement plans. The agency withdrew a proposed rule in September which would increase regulatory and liability costs, and would drive brokers out of the individual retirement account market because it would subject them to fiduciary duty for the first time. But why would we want brokers who don’t follow fiduciary duty to be in the individual retirement market?
Edi Alvarez, CFP®
BS, BEd, MS